UK Health Secretary Streeting resigns as nearly 100 Labour MPs call on Starmer to step down

British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer is fighting for his political life in Westminster after Health Secretary Wes Streeting resigned from cabinet on Thursday morning with a public letter that questioned the prime minister's leadership and a follow-up television interview in which Streeting said he had lost confidence in the leader's ability to take Labour into the next general election. Nearly 100 Labour MPs have now publicly called for Starmer to resign or to publish a timetable for his exit, the largest backbench revolt against a sitting Labour leader since Tony Blair's final months in Downing Street.
The Streeting resignation is the most consequential of a wave of internal Labour movements that began with the party's catastrophic performance in last week's local and devolved elections, in which Labour lost control of more than 30 councils across England and roughly 1,500 councillors, and in which First Minister Eluned Morgan lost her seat in the Senedd as the Welsh Labour caucus was reduced to a rump. Reform UK and the Liberal Democrats picked up the bulk of the seats, with Reform now claiming a working plurality in parts of northern England and the East Midlands.
For Canada, the unfolding crisis is more than a parliamentary curiosity. The United Kingdom is Canada's second-largest European trading partner and one of the most important partners in the Five Eyes intelligence network. The bilateral relationship spans defence procurement, energy, financial services, and intelligence sharing, all of which would be touched in ways large and small if Britain replaced its prime minister in the next several weeks. Prime Minister Mark Carney is scheduled to attend the G7 summit in Kananaskis next month, and the prospect that he could be hosting a different British counterpart from the one he has been working with for the past year is now under serious discussion in Ottawa.
What Streeting said
The resignation letter from Streeting, released to British media at 8 a.m. London time, set out the case for Starmer's exit in unusually direct terms. Streeting wrote that the prime minister had lost the confidence of the cabinet, the parliamentary party, and the Labour movement, and that the prime minister's continued leadership was preventing the party from confronting the structural problems that produced last week's election result. The former health secretary said he was offering his resignation because remaining in cabinet under the current leader was no longer consistent with his obligations to his constituents.
The letter went further than most resignation letters from sitting cabinet ministers tend to go. Streeting accused Starmer of mishandling the response to recent Reform UK gains, of failing to communicate the government's record clearly, and of allowing internal party processes to drift to a point where the leadership had lost track of what the country was thinking. He said that he would campaign for a new Labour leader and that he hoped the party could find that leader before parliamentary summer recess.
In a television interview shortly after the resignation letter was made public, Streeting declined to confirm whether he would put himself forward in a future leadership race, but he did not rule it out. He said his immediate focus would be on returning to his constituency in Ilford and on supporting any colleague who he believed could lead the party through to a general election victory.
The cabinet response
Starmer accepted the resignation in a written statement and appointed James Murray, the Labour MP for Ealing North and previously the Financial Secretary to the Treasury, as the new Health Secretary. Murray, a relatively low-profile but capable minister, has been a Starmer loyalist throughout the parliament and his appointment is being read as a holding move rather than a signal of any broader shift in direction.
The remainder of the cabinet has not followed Streeting out the door, though several ministers have given carefully worded public statements that fell short of full endorsements of the prime minister. Foreign Secretary David Lammy and Defence Secretary John Healey both confirmed their continued service in cabinet but did not address the leadership question directly. Chancellor Rachel Reeves issued a longer statement defending the government's economic record and indicating she remained focused on the comprehensive spending review due in the summer.
Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner, whose own leadership ambitions have been widely reported, has so far stayed quiet. Her allies in the parliamentary party have spent the morning meeting in committee corridors, with at least three separate factional huddles reported by Westminster correspondents. Rayner herself appeared briefly on the front bench during education questions in the Commons but has not yet given an interview.
The Burnham factor
The most significant strategic move in the past 48 hours has been Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham's confirmation that he intends to contest a by-election in the constituency of Makerfield, which was vacated on Tuesday when the sitting MP Josh Simons resigned. Burnham, a former Labour cabinet minister and twice-defeated leadership contender, has not been an MP since 2017. Returning to Westminster would give him a credible path to a future leadership challenge.
Burnham would still need to win selection from the local party and then win the by-election itself, both of which are non-trivial steps. But he is the most high-profile non-MP figure of Labour's modern era, and his return would significantly reshape the leadership conversation. Polling released over the past two weeks has consistently shown Burnham as the preferred Labour leader among both members and the general public, ahead of Starmer, Streeting, and Rayner.
Burnham told reporters in Manchester on Thursday morning that he is not actively running against Starmer but that he believes Labour needs to be open about its leadership options. He confirmed that he had spoken with senior party figures over the past 48 hours and that he would seek the National Executive Committee's permission to contest the Makerfield by-election in the coming days.
The Canadian angle
For Canadian officials, the unfolding crisis carries practical consequences. The most immediate involves the trade and investment dossier. The United Kingdom is one of the few major economies with which Canada has begun substantive negotiations on a stand-alone bilateral trade agreement, building on the post-Brexit transition arrangement that has remained in place since 2021. Those negotiations have been led on the British side by Trade Secretary Jonathan Reynolds, whose position would almost certainly change under a new prime minister.
The defence and security relationship is the other major Canadian concern. The two countries are closely entangled in the Five Eyes framework, in NATO operations across northern Europe, and in industrial procurement on platforms ranging from frigates to combat aircraft. The Royal Canadian Navy's River-class destroyer programme, an evolution of the British Type 26 design, has a significant industrial connection to BAE Systems and to UK shipyards in Glasgow. Any prolonged political turbulence in London tends to slow down those programmes.
Canadian Foreign Affairs Minister Anita Anand told reporters in Ottawa on Thursday afternoon that the government is in close contact with the British High Commission and that the relationship is operating normally at the working level despite the political instability at the top. Anand declined to comment on the leadership question but reiterated Canada's commitment to the bilateral defence and trade agenda.
The European context
The wider European picture is one of continued political volatility. France has not yet recovered from the parliamentary deadlock that followed the 2024 elections and the resignation cycle of three subsequent prime ministers. Germany is in the early months of a new coalition under Chancellor Friedrich Merz, who has prioritised defence spending and energy security but who is struggling to manage the rise of the AfD in eastern Länder. Italy's Giorgia Meloni continues to lead a stable government in Rome but is increasingly isolated within the European Union on migration policy.
The United Kingdom's leadership crisis sits inside that context and is being read by European chancelleries as an additional source of instability rather than as a domestic British affair. Starmer's so-called reset with the European Union, which has aimed at incremental closer alignment without rejoining the single market, depends on the prime minister's personal relationships with European leaders. A change of leader would not necessarily reverse the trajectory, but it would slow it and could introduce new uncertainty.
The Canadian government has been carefully tracking the European political map ahead of June's G7 meeting in Kananaskis. The summit was already going to take place against the backdrop of the Trump administration's tariff campaign and the Ukraine peace process. The possibility of a new British prime minister appearing in Alberta alongside the new French, German, and Italian leaders introduces a level of personal-relationship uncertainty that the Canadian sherpa team has rarely had to manage.
Markets and the pound
The British pound fell roughly 0.6 per cent against the U.S. dollar in early London trading on Thursday before partially recovering in afternoon sessions. UK gilt yields ticked up modestly, with the 10-year benchmark briefly trading at its highest level since February. Equities, by contrast, held up reasonably well, with the FTSE 100 little changed at midday.
The market reaction reflects what currency desks describe as a relatively narrow band of likely outcomes. Even in a scenario in which Starmer is replaced, the most likely successor is also a Labour leader from a similar centre-left tradition, and the fiscal trajectory would not change substantially in either direction. The bigger market concern is the duration of the political process and the risk that the comprehensive spending review due in the summer slides into the autumn.
Canadian investors with exposure to UK equities and to the pound are watching the volatility but have not seen the kind of disorderly moves that triggered the response to the Liz Truss mini-budget in 2022. The Bank of England's monetary policy committee is not expected to be drawn into the political instability, and any near-term rate decision is more likely to be shaped by the inflation track than by the leadership question.
What happens next
The procedural path to a Labour leadership change is not straightforward. Under the party's rules, the parliamentary party can trigger a leadership election by formally requesting one, but the threshold is high and the timing rests with the parliamentary party rather than with the leader personally. Starmer can survive politically if he can hold the cabinet together and demonstrate progress on the policy file the party cares most about, namely the NHS, immigration, and the cost of living.
The next significant test is the June meeting of the parliamentary Labour Party, at which any formal leadership challenge would need to be triggered. The party's NEC will also meet later this month. If Burnham wins the right to contest the Makerfield by-election, that vote becomes the practical kick-off to any leadership race that may follow.
For Starmer personally, the strategic question is whether to fight or to negotiate his own exit. The political playbook for British prime ministers in this position has not produced many recent winners. Boris Johnson, Theresa May, Liz Truss, and Rishi Sunak all left office on terms not of their own choosing. The Canadian Wire will continue to follow the file from London and from Ottawa.
Spotted an issue with this article?
Have something to say about this story?
Write a letter to the editor